This is perhaps the most ambiguous term of
all, the broadest definition due to the apparent confusion. Very often, it is
used as a synonym for font, font family or even replacing the term for letter.
Before the typographic revolution introduced by computers, the word typography
was a synonym for the printing press, the art of printing or the art of assembling
a book thanks to cast metal type pieces.
In the contemporary context of typographic
arts – and on the latter articles of this blog – we understand the concept of
typography as defined by Maria Moliner on the Dictionary of Spanish Usage
(DUE), “a group characteristics of types
(letters) which will make up a text”.
Or rather, as explained by Martinez de
Sousa in his Dictionary of sciences and bibliography, “the general aspect of a text
depending on the type (of letters) employed in its composition”.
To summarize, typography is a group
characteristics, which will decide on the overall aspect of a text, from the
point of view of shape/design of letters. This includes: the aesthetic look of
a book, which in turn incorporates the fonts and styles used to achieve this
result.
De Sousa differentiates the kinds of
typography, according to their properties and usage. The invisible typography
is the one used in fiction, where there is little or no variation for the eye,
the overall shape or style of a letter, aside from some words in italic or some
explanations from the author. Whereas, a structured typography is used in
informative and complex texts, in which its “typography
representations, unlike invisible typography, permits the use of various font
families, collections of letters, different sizes, bold, condensed, light, oblique,
italic, underlined styles, to be used in tables or columns, etc…” The other
kinds of typography are: digital and bibliographic.
No comments:
Post a Comment